Skip to main content

ISSA™ 5000: A New Era for Sustainability Assurance



The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has ushered in a transformative chapter in corporate reporting and assurance with the release of International Standard on Sustainability Assurance (ISSA™) 5000 – General Requirements for Sustainability Assurance Engagements. This landmark standard, approved in 2024, is designed to provide a comprehensive and globally applicable framework for the assurance of all sustainability-related information.

The Rise of Sustainability Assurance

As environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues dominate stakeholder expectations and regulatory landscapes, the demand for credible, consistent, and comparable sustainability reporting has soared. However, this growing demand has highlighted a fragmented assurance environment, with varying standards, scopes, and levels of assurance being applied across jurisdictions and industries.

Recognizing the need for clarity and global consistency, the IAASB developed ISSA 5000 as a foundational standard to guide practitioners and instill trust in sustainability-related disclosures.

What is ISSA™ 5000?

ISSA 5000 is a principles-based, overarching standard that applies to assurance engagements on sustainability information, irrespective of the specific topic (e.g., climate, biodiversity, diversity), reporting framework, or industry. It outlines the general requirements for planning, performing, and reporting such engagements, drawing on established assurance principles while allowing for flexibility in adapting to future developments.


Key features of ISSA 5000 include:

  • Applicability to both limited and reasonable assurance engagements
  • Compatibility with a wide range of sustainability reporting frameworks, such as the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards (by ISSB), GRI Standards, and jurisdiction-specific frameworks
  • Alignment with the ISAE 3000 (Revised) structure for assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information

Why ISSA 5000 Matters

The adoption of ISSA 5000 reflects a paradigm shift from standalone assurance on specific metrics—like greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions—to a more integrated and holistic approach to sustainability assurance. It aims to serve as a global baseline, adaptable by jurisdictions and scalable by assurance providers of all sizes.

By introducing a single standard to cover the full spectrum of sustainability topics, ISSA 5000 addresses:

  • Inconsistencies in assurance scope and terminology
  • Gaps in practitioner guidance for emerging sustainability topics
  • Market confusion regarding the level of assurance provided

The standard empowers users—whether investors, regulators, or the general public—to better interpret sustainability claims and distinguish between assured and non-assured information.

What Happens to ISAE 3410?

In light of the approval of ISSA 5000, the IAASB has announced the withdrawal of ISAE 3410 – Assurance Engagements on Greenhouse Gas Statements. ISAE 3410, which specifically governed GHG-related assurance, will be officially retired effective December 15, 2026, the same date that ISSA 5000 comes into force.

This consolidation signifies a maturing of the assurance landscape, reducing redundancy and positioning ISSA 5000 as the single reference point for sustainability assurance engagements going forward.

A Global Benchmark in the Making

ISSA 5000 is not a static framework—it is part of a modular system under development by the IAASB. Additional topic-specific guidance and companion standards are expected to follow, enabling the profession to respond to rapidly evolving sustainability disclosure demands.

Effective Date:

ISSA 5000 applies to assurance engagements on sustainability information for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2026, or as at a specific date on or after that same date.

Final Thoughts

The introduction of ISSA™ 5000 marks a pivotal step in strengthening the reliability of sustainability information globally. For assurance providers, regulators, companies, and investors, this standard offers clarity, comparability, and confidence in the assurance process.

As sustainability becomes a defining lens through which corporate performance is judged, ISSA 5000 lays the groundwork for a more transparent and accountable future—where trust in what’s reported is no longer a luxury, but a standard.


Comments

Popular Post

Clarifying the Regulatory Boundaries Between GTEC and ICAG: A Matter of Law, Mandate, and Global Practice

Recent public discourse has raised questions about the relationship between the Ghana Tertiary Education Commission (GTEC) and the Institute of Chartered Accountants Ghana (ICAG). A careful examination of law, regulatory mandate, and international best practice makes one position clear: ICAG is not a tertiary institution and therefore does not fall under the regulatory authority of GTEC. Statutory Mandates Are Distinct GTEC is established under the Education Regulatory Bodies Act, 2020 (Act 1023) with a clearly defined mandate to regulate tertiary education institutions and academic programmes in Ghana. Its jurisdiction extends to universities, colleges of education, technical universities, and other institutions that award academic qualifications. ICAG, on the other hand, is a statutory professional body, established to train, examine, certify, and regulate chartered accountants for professional practice. It does not award university degrees, diplomas, or academic titles. Its certif...

A Deep Dive into ISA 240 (Revised): The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud

In recent years, financial scandals and corporate failures have reignited global attention on the auditor’s role in detecting fraud. Stakeholders—including regulators, investors, and the public—are increasingly questioning whether auditors are doing enough to detect and respond to fraudulent activities during financial statement audits. In response to this concern, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has taken a significant step to strengthen the expectations and responsibilities of auditors with the proposed revisions to International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 240 . Background The existing ISA 240, titled "The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements," outlines the auditor’s obligation to obtain reasonable assurance that financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether caused by error or fraud. However, increasing complexity in financial reporting, evolving fraud schemes, and public scru...

Beyond Double-Entry: Blockchain and the Evolution of Accounting

How blockchain technology is reshaping transparency, efficiency, and trust in the accounting profession. Accounting at a Crossroads For centuries, double-entry bookkeeping has been the foundation of modern accounting. First developed in the 15th century by Luca Pacioli, this method revolutionized financial recordkeeping by introducing a system of checks and balances. Yet, even this historic innovation is not immune to the pressures of the digital age. Enter blockchain technology—a disruptive force reshaping how we think about trust, accuracy, and transparency in financial transactions. Much like double-entry bookkeeping transformed accounting, blockchain introduces a paradigm shift: triple-entry accounting. This system incorporates blockchain’s immutable ledger as a single source of truth, enabling a new level of accountability and efficiency. This article explores how blockchain technology is driving the evolution of accounting, the challenges it poses, and how accountants can ...

USAID is Finally "Dead": What’s the Implication for Africa?

This article is a follow-up to my previous piece,  Trump and Musk’s America: A Billionaire-Led Revolution and Africa’s Defining Moment , where I explored the shifting dynamics of American leadership and its impact on Africa. With the increasing privatization of global influence and the decline of traditional institutions like USAID, Africa faces a critical turning point. For decades, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has been a dominant force in global development, particularly in Africa. Through billions of dollars in aid, humanitarian assistance, and economic development programs, USAID has played a key role in shaping policies, funding critical infrastructure, and supporting democracy-building initiatives across the continent. However, with recent shifts in U.S. foreign policy, reduced political will, and global financial constraints, the agency is experiencing a significant decline. But what does the "death" of USAID really mean for Africa? Th...

The Impossible Revival? Why Andersen Consulting’s Comeback Faces Unprecedented Challenges in Today’s Consulting Landscape

The revival of Andersen Consulting under the auspices of Andersen Global has reignited debates about the viability of resurrecting a brand that once epitomized excellence in consulting. As reported by the  Financial Times  (FT), Andersen Global is strategically leveraging the historical reputation of Andersen Consulting to re-enter a transformed market dominated by firms like Accenture, McKinsey, Deloitte, and Boston Consulting Group (BCG). However, a deeper analysis reveals significant challenges in reclaiming leadership in the consulting industry. From its lack of differentiation to an unproven leadership team and a legacy of ethical controversies, Andersen Consulting’s revival faces an uphill battle. THE RISE, FALL, AND LEGACY OF ANDERSEN CONSULTING Arthur Andersen’s downfall stemmed from its complicity in the Enron accounting scandal, one of the largest corporate frauds in history. Andersen’s auditors were found to have knowingly approved misleading financial statements, l...

TRANSITIONING FROM ISQC 1 TO ISQM 1: A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR SMP’s

This article follows up on my previous piece,  “Small Firm, Big Standards: Cracking the Code of ISQM 1 for Small and Medium Practices (SMPs).”  In that article, I explored practical strategies for implementing the International Standard on Quality Management 1 (ISQM 1) in SMPs. Today, I’ll address a specific challenge many practitioners have asked about: how to transition effectively from the International Standard on Quality Control 1 (ISQC 1) to ISQM 1. The move from ISQC 1 to ISQM 1 represents a major shift from a compliance-based framework to a proactive, risk-based system of quality management. While this transition may seem daunting, it is an opportunity for SMPs to strengthen their quality processes, enhance efficiency, and stay ahead in an increasingly complex regulatory environment. In this article, I’ll outline actionable steps to help SMPs make the upgrade to ISQM 1 seamless and manageable, creating a tailored system of quality management that aligns with the new s...